Skip to main content
· 1/29/2009

Muskat v. United States

Citations

  • 554 F.3d 183
  • 103 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 666
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1624
  • 2009 WL 211067

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over refund claim under variance doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Selya, Boudin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.