Skip to main content

State v. Thornton

Citations

  • 800 A.2d 1016
  • 2002 R.I. LEXIS 171
  • 2002 WL 1402326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial justice did not err when he concluded that “the parole board, rather than the court, should assess the quality of [the defendant’s] claimed rehabilitation”
  • stating that the defendant rejected “the services of competent counsel” three times
  • court considers numerous factors, including *Page 15 societal deterrence, appropriateness of crime, employment background, and potential for rehabilitation
  • generally held that a prosecutor's cross-examination of a mental health expert in a case raising an insanity or diminished capacity defense may properly use the defendant's previous convictions or other prior bad acts to test the expert's proffered opinion and credibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lederberg, Bourcier, Flanders, Goldberg, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

105 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.