D.C. Circuit· 4/5/1996
United States v. John A. Cuffie
Citations
- 80 F.3d 514
- 317 U.S. App. D.C. 38
- 1996 WL 156352
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that \undisclosed impeachment evidence can be immaterial because of its cumulative nature only if the witness was already impeached at trial by the same kind of evidence\
- remanding for a new trial based on a Brady violation even though “the remaining evidence standing alone would have been sufficient to convict”
- evidence impeaching a witness’s credibility was material to -drug-related conviction because the witness’s testimony “established the only ' direct connection between [defendant] and the drugs”
- “In light of the axiomatic importance of truthful testimony for the integrity of judicial proceedings, undisclosed evidence of a witness’ prior perjury has a significant impact on the fairness of the trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Randolph, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. EllisFourth Circuit· 1997-08-06· cited 259×
- Simmons v. BeardThird Circuit· 2009-09-11· cited 151×
- United States v. Perry A. Graham, United States of America v. Terrence A. Terrell, United States of America v. Roger v. SmithD.C. Circuit· 1996-08-06· cited 100×
- United States v. CelisD.C. Circuit· 2010-06-18· cited 90×
- United States v. Whitmore, Gerald F.D.C. Circuit· 2004-03-05· cited 88×
- United States v. Bowie, Walter J.D.C. Circuit· 1999-12-21· cited 85×
- State v. FloydSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-07-25· cited 73×
- United States v. JohnsonD.C. Circuit· 2008-03-11· cited 66×
- United States v. HemphillD.C. Circuit· 2008-02-08· cited 63×
- Conley v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2005-07-20· cited 61×
- State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-09-05· cited 57×
- United States v. Oruche, SorensonD.C. Circuit· 2007-05-04· cited 52×
- Lisle v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 50×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2014-05-19· cited 50×
- ALONZO R. VAUGHN and CARL S. MORTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-07-03· cited 47×
- In Re Sealed Case No. 99-3096(brady Obligations)D.C. Circuit· 1999-07-21· cited 42×
- Jamison v. CollinsS.D. Ohio· 2000-05-10· cited 37×
- United States v. BrodieD.C. Circuit· 2008-05-06· cited 30×
- United States v. Timothy R. ThomasD.C. Circuit· 2013-12-27· cited 28×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-08-18· cited 22×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Wood v. BartholomewSupreme Court· 1995-10-10· cited 330×
- United States v. Carol Kozinski, Ilmi Fejzoski, James Havelka, Jeanette Martinez, James Brennan, James Abney, Mark Morgan, and Peter DemopoulosSeventh Circuit· 1994-02-18· cited 193×
- United States v. S. Mohammad MarashiNinth Circuit· 1990-09-05· cited 156×
- United States v. Thomas J. MaloneySeventh Circuit· 1996-03-15· cited 127×
- United States v. David W. SmithD.C. Circuit· 1996-03-05· cited 64×
- United States v. Jose Santos Quintanilla, United States of America v. Juan Torres VelasquezEighth Circuit· 1994-06-03· cited 60×
- United States v. Tyrone DerrD.C. Circuit· 1993-04-20· cited 59×
- United States v. Jose DelunaTenth Circuit· 1993-12-07· cited 45×
- United States v. John David O'conner, United States of America v. George Alberto Monreal, United States of America v. Medardo Edward LugoEighth Circuit· 1995-10-16· cited 23×
- United States v. Charles N. Lloyd, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1996-02-05· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.