Skip to main content
· 5/4/2007

United States v. Oruche, Sorenson

Citations

  • 484 F.3d 590
  • 376 U.S. App. D.C. 92
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 10488
  • 2007 WL 1296601

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[O]nce a court finds a Brady violation, a new trial follows as the prescribed remedy, not as a matter of discretion.” (citation omitted)
  • “[O]nce the existence and content of undisclosed evidence has been established, the assessment of the materiality of this evidence under Brady is a question of law.”
  • strength of overall evidence against defendant relevant in finding no Brady violation
  • “[W]e do not see how [the witness’s] jottings on the sheet of notes (three telephone numbers and the words ‘O’ and ‘Girlfriend (Leslie)’) could have been used to undermine [the witness’s] credibility.”
  • failure to disclose grand jury transcript of witness’s admission to lying in another case was not Brady violation because witness was “thoroughly impeached” at trial when cross-examined about prior convictions, past incidents of lying and benefits received in exchange for testimony
  • the remedy for a Brady violation is a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Henderson, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.