· 5/4/2007
United States v. Oruche, Sorenson
Citations
- 484 F.3d 590
- 376 U.S. App. D.C. 92
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 10488
- 2007 WL 1296601
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[O]nce a court finds a Brady violation, a new trial follows as the prescribed remedy, not as a matter of discretion.” (citation omitted)
- “[O]nce the existence and content of undisclosed evidence has been established, the assessment of the materiality of this evidence under Brady is a question of law.”
- strength of overall evidence against defendant relevant in finding no Brady violation
- “[W]e do not see how [the witness’s] jottings on the sheet of notes (three telephone numbers and the words ‘O’ and ‘Girlfriend (Leslie)’) could have been used to undermine [the witness’s] credibility.”
- failure to disclose grand jury transcript of witness’s admission to lying in another case was not Brady violation because witness was “thoroughly impeached” at trial when cross-examined about prior convictions, past incidents of lying and benefits received in exchange for testimony
- the remedy for a Brady violation is a new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Henderson, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.