Skip to main content

State v. Wilcox

Citations

  • 254 Conn. 441
  • 758 A.2d 824
  • 2000 Conn. LEXIS 286

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • focusing on what defen- dant had done and not on what he had left to do
  • ‘‘the testimony of a number of witnesses corroborated the victim’s testimony that the defendant had kidnapped and physically and sexually assaulted her’’
  • defendant found to have “forcibly grabbed the victim’s arm in order to prevent her from exiting [his] vehicle,” and proceeded to drive victim out to woods to sexually assault her
  • suppressed evidence is material “if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different” [emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “[t]o establish a Brady violation, the defendant must show that [1] the government suppressed evidence, [2] the suppressed evidence was favorable to the defendant, and [3] it was material [either to guilt or to punishment]” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz, McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.