Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
D.C. Circuit· 6/18/2010

United States v. Celis

Citations

  • 608 F.3d 818
  • 391 U.S. App. D.C. 112
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12596
  • 2010 WL 2431908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant was not herself entitled to effective review of all discovery produced given that her counsel could review discovery and discuss it with her
  • explaining that “district courts should grant severance sparingly . . . ‘to conserve the time of courts, prosecutors, witnesses, and jurors’”
  • observing that the Supreme Court “has addressed such disclosure issues on a case-by-case basis”
  • describing a district court’s protective order that allowed witnesses to testify using pseudonyms but required disclosure of their true names to defense counsel
  • upholding conviction over defendants’ objection to district court’s order permitting prosecution witnesses to testify under pseudonyms
  • affirming protective order despite lack of showing that any appellant \had personally threatened any government witness\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers and Griffith, Circuit Judges, and Silberman, Senior Circuit Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Celis

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.