Skip to main content
· 10/10/1995

Wood v. Bartholomew

Citations

  • 516 U.S. 1
  • 116 S. Ct. 7
  • 133 L. Ed. 2d 1
  • 1995 U.S. LEXIS 6760

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that evidence that is inadmissible under state law is not material for purposes of establishing a Brady violation
  • finding that polygraph results could not be considered Brady material when those results would not have been admissible under state law
  • finding that polygraph results were not evidence for Brady purposes because they were inadmissible under state law
  • holding evidence \material\ under Brady only where there exists reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed, the result of trial would have been different
  • noting that federal courts should not grant “habeas relief on the basis of little more than speculation with slight support”
  • stating that a federal court may not grant habeas relief “on the basis of little more than speculation with slight support.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.