· 10/10/1995
Wood v. Bartholomew
Citations
- 516 U.S. 1
- 116 S. Ct. 7
- 133 L. Ed. 2d 1
- 1995 U.S. LEXIS 6760
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that evidence that is inadmissible under state law is not material for purposes of establishing a Brady violation
- finding that polygraph results could not be considered Brady material when those results would not have been admissible under state law
- finding that polygraph results were not evidence for Brady purposes because they were inadmissible under state law
- holding evidence \material\ under Brady only where there exists reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed, the result of trial would have been different
- noting that federal courts should not grant “habeas relief on the basis of little more than speculation with slight support”
- stating that a federal court may not grant habeas relief “on the basis of little more than speculation with slight support.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.