Skip to main content
First Circuit· 1/7/2004

United States v. Sanchez

Citations

  • 354 F.3d 70
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 120
  • 2004 WL 32864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that unless the findings of fact are “clearly erroneous,” higher courts must defer to those findings as the sentencing courts have a superior “coign of vantage”
  • reasoning that once a court deems a cross reference applicable, it must proceed to the new offense guideline and apply it as written

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Coffin, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.