United States v. Ramon Alfredo Abreu, A/K/A Carlos Juan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even though a weapon is never fired, if it is kept nearby by a drug dealer, it is ‘used’ so as to satisfy the statutory requirement.”
• \It is the province of the jury to decide to appropriate weight to give specific evidence.\
• \It is the province of the jury to decide the appropriate weight to give specific evidence.\
• “evidence in question properly admitted if it is readily identifiable by a unique feature or other identifying mark”
• “It is the province of the jury to decide to appropriate weight to give specific evidence.”
• prosecutor did not invoke the golden rule argument when he \simply called on the jury to employ its ■'collective common sense' in evaluating the evidence and to draw reasonable inferences therefrom\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).