United States v. Johnny Rafael Batista-Polanco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that enhancement of sentence for attempting to obstruct justice by testifying falsely in own defense implicates no constitutional right
• \'understanding of human behavior' may ground reasonable inference from circumstantial evidence\
• “[T]he factfinder may fairly infer ... that it runs counter to human experience to suppose that criminal conspirators would welcome innocent nonparticipants as witnesses to their crimes.”
• the obstruction of justice enhancement for falsely testifying in one's own defense does not implicate a constitutional right
• the obstruction of justice enhancement for falsely testifying in one's own defense does not implicate a constitutional right
• \[T]he factfinder may fairly infer . . . that it runs counter to human experience to suppose that criminal conspirators would welcome innocent nonparticipants as witnesses to their crimes.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).