Skip to main content
· 2/19/1986

United States v. James Edward Eakes

Citations

  • 783 F.2d 499
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 140
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A district judge has the discretion to continue a trial under the ends of justice provision even though the Act does not require an additional thirty-days after arraignment on a superseding indictment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Tate, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.