Fourth Circuit· 11/11/1976
United States v. Dwayne Dolan
Citations
- 544 F.2d 1219
- 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 6277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that lay testimony and circumstantial evidence is sufficient, in and of itself, to establish identity of controlled substances
- holding that “lay testimony and circumstantial evidence may be sufficient, without the introduction of an expert chemical analysis, to establish the identi[t]y of the substance involved in an alleged narcotics transaction”
- stating that the identity of a drug may be established in a number of ways
- lay testimony and cir- cumstantial evidence is sufficient to identify controlled substances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winter, Russell, Widener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Kevin Eugene WrightSixth Circuit· 1994-02-14· cited 237×
- State of Iowa v. Robin Eugene BrubakerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2011-09-23· cited 179×
- United States v. Innocent U. UwaemeFourth Circuit· 1992-11-02· cited 177×
- Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-03-26· cited 127×
- United States v. HallTenth Circuit· 2007-01-23· cited 94×
- United States v. Ewan Bryce, Also Known as Ian, Darren Johnson, Also Known as D-Nice, Also Known as DSecond Circuit· 2000-03-07· cited 83×
- In Re the Personal Restraint of ReismillerWashington Supreme Court· 1984-03-08· cited 82×
- People v. ParkIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-09-29· cited 78×
- United States v. TrentTenth Circuit· 2014-09-25· cited 62×
- United States v. Jessica DurhamNinth Circuit· 2006-09-22· cited 58×
- State v. SobelSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-07-20· cited 56×
- United States v. James Edward EakesFifth Circuit· 1986-02-19· cited 54×
- People v. VeamatahauCalifornia Supreme Court· 2020-02-27· cited 53×
- United States v. Wayne Franklin Traylor, Ardis May Traylor, and John Horace AndrewsNinth Circuit· 1981-09-21· cited 45×
- Urrutia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-09-24· cited 45×
- Best v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-04-27· cited 45×
- United States v. Yolanda Sanchez DefundoraTenth Circuit· 1990-01-10· cited 43×
- State v. BroomeLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2014-04-09· cited 43×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-11-19· cited 42×
- United States v. Barbara Lynn BaggettTenth Circuit· 1990-01-12· cited 39×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-01-13· cited 309×
- United States v. Burl A. Sawyers, Vincent J. Johnkoski, Bonn Brown, Alfred W. SchroathFourth Circuit· 1970-03-23· cited 126×
- United States v. George LawsonSeventh Circuit· 1974-12-19· cited 115×
- United States v. Paul F. GregorioFourth Circuit· 1974-05-31· cited 100×
- United States v. Roy Braswell ShermanFourth Circuit· 1970-05-18· cited 86×
- Charles E. Toliver v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1955-07-26· cited 64×
- United States v. Patricia AtkinsEighth Circuit· 1973-02-21· cited 61×
- United States v. Charles SchrenzelEighth Circuit· 1972-07-28· cited 56×
- United States v. Antonio Quesada, Alfredo Flores, A/K/A Ali and Maritza BrezotFifth Circuit· 1975-06-11· cited 55×
- Stanton v. New York & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1890-07-10· cited 50×
- United States v. Gino Fantuzzi, A/K/A Luis Jorge Vasquez UrbinaSecond Circuit· 1972-07-10· cited 35×
- United States v. Harold E. MillsD.C. Circuit· 1972-01-13· cited 22×
- Floyd Linn Rathbun v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1956-10-01· cited 17×
- United States v. James Van BurenTenth Circuit· 1975-03-05· cited 14×
- Bronstein v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1927-01-10· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.