United States v. Rory Allen Meeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence was sufficient to show that substance was cocaine, when \each of the witnesses personally used the substances which he or she believed to be cocaine\
• “Statements . . . identifying a co-conspirator’s source for [drugs] have been deemed to be statements made ‘in furtherance’ of the conspiracy.”
• \The identity of a substance may be established by indirect circumstantial evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.\
• statements identifying a source of cocaine
• co-conspirators used substance and called it “cocaine”
• statements identifying a source of cocaine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).