Skip to main content
· 12/10/1991

United States v. Warren Eugene Wake

Citations

  • 948 F.2d 1422
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 1394
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28865
  • 1991 WL 258638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the lack of handwriting analysis did not bar admission of evidence when there was other circumstantial evidence through the testimony of an investigating officer to authenticate the writings contained in “tally sheets” found in defendant’s office
  • law enforcement officer testimony describing the circumstances in which writings were seized from defendant's possession or control adequately supported finding of authentication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Wiener, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.