Skip to main content
First Circuit· 2/9/1995

United States v. Jackman

Citations

  • 48 F.3d 1
  • 41 Fed. R. Serv. 361
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2362
  • 1995 WL 41764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “familiarity with the defendant in clothing similar to that worn by the person in the [video] at issue” is relevant when determining whether lay opinion testimony is admissible
  • observing that “familiarity with the defendant in clothing similar to that worn by the person in the [video] at issue” is relevant when determining whether lay opinion testimony is admissible
  • discussing the admissibility under Fed. Evid. Rule 701 of opinion testimony identifying a defendant from surveillance photographs
  • discussing the admissibility under Fed. R. Evid. 701 of opinion testimony identifying a defendant from surveillance photographs
  • identifying the six factors courts should consider when determining whether a stay or dismissal is appropriate under Colorado River
  • allowing defendant’s brother to offer lay opinion defendant is not robber portrayed in surveillance video

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Bownes, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Jackman

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.