Skip to main content
· 7/29/1991

United States v. Brett Stormer

Citations

  • 938 F.2d 759
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 625
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 16704
  • 1991 WL 137605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming admission of officers’ lay opinion testimony identifying the defendant from surveillance photographs, due to officers’ familiarity with the defendant’s appearance, the defendant’s disguise during the crime, and the poor quality of the photographs
  • similar precautionary procedures taken plus preliminary instruction regarding the weight to be given lay opinion testimony was given before testimony heard and in final charge to jury
  • similar precautionary procedures taken plus preliminary instruction regarding the weight to be given lay opinion testimony was given before testimony heard and in final charge to jury
  • identification testimony by police officers admissible where extensive examination conducted outside presence of jury
  • witness had \worked with [the defendant] for several years\
  • wit- ness had “worked with [the defendant] for several years”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Posner, Coffey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.