United States v. Anthony Lapierre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding opinion testimony by investigating police officer identifying defendant in surveillance photograph because defendant's appearance had not changed between time of robbery and trial and officer had never seen defendant before in person
• explaining the contexts in which such testimony has been held admissible
• videotape of line-up where counsel not present did not satisfy Wade's concerns because it did not record anything that occurred in witness room
• right to counsel “attaches to the period during which an accused is within sight of a potential identification witness”
• 28(j) letter “cannot raise a new issue” that was not addressed in the briefs
• “The jury, after all, was able to view the surveillance photos of LaPierre and make an independent determination whether it believed that the individual pictured in the photos was in fact LaPierre.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).