Pacamor Bearings, Inc. v. Minebea Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Samson Crane to be no longer controlling in the First Circuit
• discussing attorney-client privilege and explaining that “documents prepared by non-attorneys and addressed to non-attorneys with copies routed to counsel are generally not privileged since they are not communications made ‘primarily for legal advice.’”
• “Because the issues raised in the motion and cross-motion are identical, the court will discuss and resolve [them] in unison.”
• “Because the issues raised in the motion and cross-motion are identical, the court will discuss and resolve [them] in unison.”
• “[M]aterials assembled in the ordinary course of business . . . are not protected under Rule 26(b)(3
• “Attachments which do not, by their content, fall within the realm of privilege cannot become privileged merely by attaching them to a communication with the attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).