United States v. Kornegay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that detective’s con- tact with defendant ‘‘on six occasions within a few months is within the zone that courts have found accept- able to show that the witness was sufficiently familiar with the defendant to provide a useful identification’’
• affirming identification testimony of officer who met with defendant six times in one summer for purpose of distinguishing him from his twin brother
• requiring \specific facts\ to justify Booker remand, not merely recitation of sentencing factors
• requiring “specific facts” to justify Booker remand, not merely recitation of sentencing factors
• contact with the defendant six times within a few months was sufficient for the detective to identify defendant in surveillance pictures
• contact with the defendant six times within a few months was sufficient for the - 25 - detective to identify defendant in surveillance pictures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).