United States v. Jerry Lee Wright, United States of America v. Jerry Lee Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no Sixth Amendment violation occurred when defendants declined (for tactical reasons) to cross-examine witnesses who were called by the prosecution
• allowing testimony where “[t]he picture taken of [the defendant] as he removed his mask was not a model of clarity”
• allowing testimony where picture showed defendant as he removed mask was not a “model of clarity”
• allowing testimony where picture showed defendant as he removed mask was not a “model of clarity”
• admitting identification testimony where witnesses had known defendant for between two and thirteen years
• court properly admitted identification testimony of police officer who had seen defendant eight to ten times over two to three years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).