United States v. Heldeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that statements by the district judge at sentencing are a key source of information in assessing whether the trial court would likely be more lenient under an advisory system
• recognizing a district judge may well not have expressed his or her reservations because the guidelines made them hopeless
• requiring, at a bare minimum, a “reasonable indication that the district judge might well have reached a different result under advisory guidelines”
• requiring, at a bare minimum, a \reasonable indication that the district judge might well have reached a different result under advisory guidelines\
• requiring a \reasonable indication that the district judge might well have reached a different result under advisory guidelines\
• requiring a \reasonable indication that the district judge might well have reached a different result under advisory guidelines\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).