First Circuit· 3/29/2005

United States v. Heldeman

Citations

402 F.3d 220
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4966
2005 WL 708397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that statements by the district judge at sentencing are a key source of information in assessing whether the trial court would likely be more lenient under an advisory system
recognizing a district judge may well not have expressed his or her reservations because the guidelines made them hopeless
requiring, at a bare minimum, a “reasonable indication that the district judge might well have reached a different result under advisory guidelines”
requiring, at a bare minimum, a \reasonable indication that the district judge might well have reached a different result under advisory guidelines\
requiring a \reasonable indication that the district judge might well have reached a different result under advisory guidelines\
requiring a \reasonable indication that the district judge might well have reached a different result under advisory guidelines\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Campbell, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.