United States v. Edison Misla-Aldarondo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the nexus requirement applies only to forfeiture motions in which the government seeks forfeiture of specific property, not to forfeiture orders taking the form of monetary awards
• thirteen out of eighty-four jurors excused for possible bias is too low to presume prejudice
• publicity must be both extensive and sensational in nature
• distinguishing between a presumption of prejudice and actual prejudice
• 13 of 84 potential jurors — 15%—excused for cause
• reviewing a judge-determined forfeiture amount

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).