Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 8/30/2007

United States v. Goff

Citations

  • 501 F.3d 250
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20946
  • 2007 WL 2445637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant’s lack of a propensity to molest children “is, in one sense, irrelevant” to the District Court’s assessment of the seriousness of the crime of possessing child pornography
  • noting that individuals who \possess child pornography directly contribute to [children's] continuing victimization\
  • finding an unreasonably lenient sentence when the district court deviated drastically from the norm with respect to a defendant in the \heartland\ of offenders rather than an outlier
  • explaining that the defendant’s “criminal history, in Category I, is similar to the vast majority of those convicted” of the same offense, and therefore, the defendant “is no outlier; he is, on the contrary, plainly in the ‘heartland’ of offenders.”
  • opining the consumer of child pornography provides an economic motive for creating and distributing child pornography
  • finding an unreasonably lenient sentence when the district court deviated drastically from the norm with respect to a defendant in the “heartland” of offenders rather than an outlier

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Jordan, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Goff

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.