Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Seventh Circuit· 10/14/2005

United States v. Allan Johnson

Citations

  • 427 F.3d 423
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22183
  • 2005 WL 2592218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a remand is only necessary \if we are in doubt\ about what a district court would have done
  • stating that a remand is only necessary “if we are in doubt” about what a district court would have done
  • stating that sentencing courts can “give further weight to a factor covered by a specific guidelines adjustment, especially where (as is true here
  • stating that “[the concept of] ‘departures’ has been rendered obsolete by . . . Booker”
  • stating that a remand is only necessary “if we are in doubt” about what a district court would have done
  • noting that it is permissible to consider the version of the Guidelines in effect at sentencing “as one benchmark to gauge the reasonableness” of the sentence without implication of ex post facto concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Wood, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Allan Johnson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.