United States v. Allan Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a remand is only necessary \if we are in doubt\ about what a district court would have done
• stating that a remand is only necessary “if we are in doubt” about what a district court would have done
• stating that sentencing courts can “give further weight to a factor covered by a specific guidelines adjustment, especially where (as is true here
• stating that “[the concept of] ‘departures’ has been rendered obsolete by . . . Booker”
• stating that a remand is only necessary “if we are in doubt” about what a district court would have done
• noting that it is permissible to consider the version of the Guidelines in effect at sentencing “as one benchmark to gauge the reasonableness” of the sentence without implication of ex post facto concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).