United States v. Jeremy Goldberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the Guidelines as “drafted by a provide fails to support the degree of downward variance. 54 respected public body with access to the best knowledge and practices of penology”
• dissemination of child pornography fosters consumer demand that results in creation of more child pornography
• vacating sentence of one-day imprisonment and 10 years’ supervised release
• where even the dis- trict court admitted that its balancing was “odd”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).