Skip to main content
· 7/11/2006

United States v. Donald James King

Citations

  • 454 F.3d 187
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17274
  • 2006 WL 1889976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant’s “lack of remorse” was an appropriate consideration supporting the district court’s sentence
  • concluding that the defendant’s “lack of remorse” was an appropriate consideration supporting the district court’s sentence
  • noting that our pre-Booker case law \continues to have advisory force\
  • noting that our pre-Booker case law “continues to have advisory force”
  • noting that our pre-Booker case law “continues to have advisory force”
  • affirming sentence despite district court’s failure to adhere to departure standards because district court “did in fact touch all the bases required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Ambro, Michel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.