Skip to main content
· 3/2/1999

United States v. Fred M. Glover

Citations

  • 153 F.3d 749
  • 332 U.S. App. D.C. 74
  • 1998 WL 558815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he circuits uniformly have rejected similar Ex Post Facto attacks on other repeat offender statutes.” (collecting cases)
  • “[T]he circuits uniformly have rejected similar Ex Post Facto attacks on other repeat offender statutes.” . (collecting cases)
  • Congress’s “reclassification” of defendant’s prior convictions provided “‘fair warning’ . . . that he would face stiffer penalties as a repeat offender if he committed another drug-related offense.”
  • Congress’s “reclassification” of defendant’s prior convictions provided “ ‘fair warning ... that he would face, stiffen penalties as a repeat offender if he committed ..another drug-related, offense,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman, Williams, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.