· 3/2/1999
United States v. Fred M. Glover
Citations
- 153 F.3d 749
- 332 U.S. App. D.C. 74
- 1998 WL 558815
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he circuits uniformly have rejected similar Ex Post Facto attacks on other repeat offender statutes.” (collecting cases)
- “[T]he circuits uniformly have rejected similar Ex Post Facto attacks on other repeat offender statutes.” . (collecting cases)
- Congress’s “reclassification” of defendant’s prior convictions provided “‘fair warning’ . . . that he would face stiffer penalties as a repeat offender if he committed another drug-related offense.”
- Congress’s “reclassification” of defendant’s prior convictions provided “ ‘fair warning ... that he would face, stiffen penalties as a repeat offender if he committed ..another drug-related, offense,”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Silberman, Williams, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.