United States v. Milford Burkley, (Two Cases)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the government “need not, though it may, prove that there was no government inducement of or partici- pation in the crime”
• explaining that after the defense raised entrapment, predisposition “became in effect an essential element of the crimes charged”
• noting plan evidence is admissible under Rule 404(b) “to show the existence of a common scheme or plan embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of the one tends to establish the other”
• describing the evidentiary foundation necessary for an entrapment instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).