United States v. Hanson, Jamal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to apply career offender enhancement in making Guidelines estimate was deficient, but finding no prejudice
• counsel is deficient if counsel “makes a plainly incorrect estimate of the likely sentence due to ignorance of applicable law of which he should have been aware”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).