Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 5/15/2015

United States v. John Bigley

Citations

  • 415 U.S. App. D.C. 168
  • 786 F.3d 11
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8012
  • 2015 WL 2330300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing sentencing manipulation where an “officer ma[de] multiple drug buys from the defendant before finally arresting him”
  • finding plain error where district court failed to consider defendant’s nonfrivolous mitigation argument
  • sentencing law calls for district court to “respond[ ] to a defendant’s arguments”
  • sentencing law calls for district court to “respond[] to a defendant’s arguments”
  • district court “may have thought it was prohibited, as a matter of law, from considering” sentencing entrapment
  • reversing below-Guidelines sentence for failure to consider nonfrivolous argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland, Brown, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.