Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 8/11/1986

United States v. Fred Hill

Citations

  • 798 F.2d 402
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27941

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “for purposes of awarding restitution under the VWPA, a district court is not limited either by the amount specified in the indictment or the specific transactions alleged in the indictment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrett, Anderson, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Fred Hill

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.