United States v. Donald A. Hairston, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he record provides an adequate ba- sis upon which to review the district court’s restitution order.”
• “The fact that the USCA11 Case: 19-14969 Document: 113-1 Date Filed: 01/05/2024 Page: 45 of 56 19-14969 Opinion of the Court 45 [evidence] is hearsay . . . does not bar the trial judge from consid- ering it in forming the order of restitution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).