United States v. Donna Marie Sunrhodes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that restitution is part of sentencing and that defendant has no right to confrontation
• holding telephonic testimony in a restitution proceeding did not violate the confrontation clause or rule against hearsay when the witness was placed under oath over the telephone and was subject to cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).