United States v. Peter Arvanitis, Stanley Peters, John Yannakis, Perikles Panagiotaros, and Robert Richards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defense counsel’s mere inaccurate prediction of the sentencing guidelines did not amount to ineffective assistance
• considering restitution prior to the enactment of 18 U.S.C. sec. 3663A
• “attorney’s incorrect estimate of the applicable offense severity rating” under Parole Commission Guidelines not ineffective assistance of counsel
• attorneys’ fees spent investigating fraudulent claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).