United States v. Charles Ira Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecutor’s letter—advising witnesses of their right to decline defendant’s request for interview—constituted a correct statement of law and was not improper
• holding that prosecutor = s letter C advising witnesses of their right to decline defendant = s request for interview C constituted a correct statement of law and was not improper
• explaining that there is no violation of the Sixth Amendment when witnesses voluntarily decline pre-trial interviews with defense counsel
• “The defendant’s right of access is not violated when a witness chooses voluntarily not to be interviewed.”
• fact that disputed evidence was found in Appellant's home is sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).