United States v. Hector Rivera-Martinez, A/K/A El Men

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that double jeopardy clause did not prohibit sentences for both the continuing criminal enterprise and aiding and abetting
• noting that law of the case doctrine does not apply when \controlling authority has since made a contrary decision of the law applicable\
• recognizing the presence of \exceptional circumstances\ where there is new evidence in a subsequent trial, the controlling legal authority has changed, or the court's decision was clearly erroneous and would work a manifest injustice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).