United States v. DeLuna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in denying defendant’s rule 48(b) motion where an eighteen-month delay between indictment and trial was “the result of the need of the prosecution and defense to prepare for the trial” and “there was no purposeful delay by the government”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. DeLuna

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. DeLuna
  W.D. Missouri· 1984-03-19· cited 10×
• United States v. DeLuna
  W.D. Missouri· 1985-08-19· cited 5×
• United States v. Deluna
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-05-29
• United States v. Deluna
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-02-20