United States v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez, United States of America v. Carlos Latorre, United States of America v. Manuel Parrilla-Marquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an appellate court “must consider the defendant’s challenge to [the] sufficiency of the evidence to ensure that the prohibition against double jeopardy is upheld” regardless of any other errors
• “Without a timely objection stating the specific grounds therefor, our review is limited to plain error.”
• evidence of prior crime admissible at later trial, notwithstanding earlier acquittal, to prove “a fact that was not necessarily decided by the jury in reaching its verdict”
• evidence of prior crime admissible at later trial, notwithstanding earlier acquittal, to prove \a fact that was not necessarily decided by the jury in reaching its verdict\
• acquittal on charge of arson conspiracy barred subsequent prosecution for involvement in the same conspiracy
• “The factual determination whether the plea agreement has been breached lies with the trial judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).