United States v. Hoffecker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party cannot use a Rule 28(j) letter to raise additional arguments omitted from an opening brief
• holding that appellant had waived argument raised for the first time in a Rule 28(j) letter
• holding that the district court correctly defined reasonable doubt for the jury based on the Third Circuit Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions § 3.06
• holding that appellant had waived argument raised for the first time in a Rule 28(j) letter
• holding that the district court correctly defined reasonable doubt for the jury based on the Third Circuit Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions § 3.06
• holding that appellant waived an issue on appeal by failing to comply with Fed. R.App. P. 28(a)(9)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).