Ninth Circuit· 1/26/2004
United States v. Daniel R. Williams
Citations
- 356 F.3d 1045
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1085
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the potential for serious negative side effects is also germane to the analysis of whether a condition implicates a particularly significant liberty interest
- noting that the potential for serious negative side effects is also germane to the analy- sis of whether a condition implicates a particularly significant liberty interest
- requiring findings based on a \medically-informed record\ before antipsychotic medication could be required as a term of supervised release
- requiring findings based on a “medically-informed record” before antipsychotic medication could be required as a term of supervised release
- limiting the application of Rearden where supervised release condition involves requirement that defendant take psychotropic drugs; district court must make explicit, specific finding under § 3583(d)(2)
- referring to an \order compelling a person to take antipsychotic medication\ as \an especially grave infringement of liberty\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Hug, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. WatsonNinth Circuit· 2009-09-23· cited 745×
- United States v. StoterauNinth Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 328×
- Sanchez v. Pereira-CastilloFirst Circuit· 2009-12-23· cited 326×
- United States v. Matthew Henry WeberNinth Circuit· 2006-06-20· cited 175×
- United States v. SolteroNinth Circuit· 2007-12-12· cited 172×
- United States v. Antonio D. StephensNinth Circuit· 2005-09-02· cited 137×
- United States v. MikeTenth Circuit· 2011-02-17· cited 132×
- Poeple v. Robert S.Illinois Supreme Court· 2004-11-18· cited 118×
- United States v. Rodriguez-RodriguezNinth Circuit· 2006-03-22· cited 115×
- United States v. CopeNinth Circuit· 2008-06-04· cited 114×
- United States v. BettsNinth Circuit· 2007-12-14· cited 100×
- Travis Bean v. Dolly MatteucciNinth Circuit· 2021-01-20· cited 91×
- United States v. David P. GnirkeNinth Circuit· 2015-01-02· cited 75×
- United States v. Ruiz-GaxiolaNinth Circuit· 2010-09-24· cited 63×
- In Re The Detention Of B.m.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-01-08· cited 61×
- United States v. Abisai Rivera-GuerreroNinth Circuit· 2005-10-19· cited 57×
- United States v. Dennis EmmettNinth Circuit· 2014-04-17· cited 56×
- United States v. EsparzaNinth Circuit· 2009-01-20· cited 50×
- United States v. RuddNinth Circuit· 2011-11-23· cited 44×
- People v. Luis F.California Court of Appeal· 2009-08-31· cited 44×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court· 1990-04-16· cited 1,489×
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-06-16· cited 1,055×
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 752×
- Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 734×
- United States v. Robert BolingerNinth Circuit· 1991-07-30· cited 287×
- United States v. Chance ReardenNinth Circuit· 2003-11-06· cited 265×
- Department of Commerce v. United States House of RepresentativesSupreme Court· 1999-01-25· cited 247×
- In Re QawiCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-01-05· cited 233×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin James BEE, Jr., Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1998-12-22· cited 137×
- United States v. Luis Montenegro-RojoNinth Circuit· 1990-07-11· cited 130×
- United States v. T.M.Ninth Circuit· 2003-06-04· cited 118×
- United States v. Otis W. Fellows, IIINinth Circuit· 1998-10-15· cited 90×
- United States v. Bernardo Louisiano NavarroNinth Circuit· 1992-12-31· cited 83×
- United States v. Melendez-SantanaFirst Circuit· 2003-12-24· cited 80×
- United States v. Todd Allen Johnson, A/K/A David Brandon WilliamsNinth Circuit· 1993-07-08· cited 77×
- United States v. Juan Jose LopezNinth Circuit· 2001-08-06· cited 69×
- Jeffrey E. Felce v. Patrick Fiedler, Earl Brunk, Also Known as Andy Brunk, David H. Dhein, and James L. SchansbergSeventh Circuit· 1992-09-15· cited 68×
- United States v. LoweNinth Circuit· 1981-08-24· cited 53×
- United States v. Bernard GrossNinth Circuit· 2002-10-07· cited 42×
- United States v. Alfred RomeroNinth Circuit· 1982-05-07· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.