· 1/26/2004
United States v. Daniel R. Williams
Citations
- 356 F.3d 1045
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1085
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the potential for serious negative side effects is also germane to the analysis of whether a condition implicates a particularly significant liberty interest
- noting that the potential for serious negative side effects is also germane to the analy- sis of whether a condition implicates a particularly significant liberty interest
- requiring findings based on a \medically-informed record\ before antipsychotic medication could be required as a term of supervised release
- requiring findings based on a “medically-informed record” before antipsychotic medication could be required as a term of supervised release
- limiting the application of Rearden where supervised release condition involves requirement that defendant take psychotropic drugs; district court must make explicit, specific finding under § 3583(d)(2)
- referring to an \order compelling a person to take antipsychotic medication\ as \an especially grave infringement of liberty\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Hug, Berzon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.