Skip to main content
· 1/26/2004

United States v. Daniel R. Williams

Citations

  • 356 F.3d 1045
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 1085

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the potential for serious negative side effects is also germane to the analysis of whether a condition implicates a particularly significant liberty interest
  • noting that the potential for serious negative side effects is also germane to the analy- sis of whether a condition implicates a particularly significant liberty interest
  • requiring findings based on a \medically-informed record\ before antipsychotic medication could be required as a term of supervised release
  • requiring findings based on a “medically-informed record” before antipsychotic medication could be required as a term of supervised release
  • limiting the application of Rearden where supervised release condition involves requirement that defendant take psychotropic drugs; district court must make explicit, specific finding under § 3583(d)(2)
  • referring to an \order compelling a person to take antipsychotic medication\ as \an especially grave infringement of liberty\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Hug, Berzon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.