United States v. Rudd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that residency restrictions in urban areas can “subject defendants to a state of ‘constant eviction’”
• stating that, additionally, “[sjeveral courts have also found that similar residency restrictions subject defendants to a state of ‘constant eviction,’ because the prohibited locations could potentially move or open in new places”
• concluding. that “[kjnowingly or purposely causing or attempting to cause bodily injury or making another person fear imminent bodily harm necessarily requires using, attempting to use, or threatening to use physical force”
• vacating a special condition on the ground that it appeared arbitrary and remanding for the district court to further explain or reconsider the condition
• vacating a special condition on the ground that it appeared arbitrary and remanding for the district court to further explain or reconsider the condition
• finding an abuse of discretion in the imposition of 2,000 feet restriction over objection without articulating a sufficient basis for the distance chosen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).