UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin James BEE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “even very broad conditions are reasonable if they are intended to promote the probationer’s rehabilitation and to protect the public”
• infringing upon free speech interests by prohibiting the possession of sexually stimulating or sexually oriented material
• directing a defendant, who had sexually abused a minor, not to “have contact with children under the age of 18 unless approved by [his] probation officer”
• upholding condition that appellant “not have contact with children under the age of 18 unless approved by [his] probation officer”
• upholding condition that appellant “not have contact with children under the age of 18 unless approved by [his] probation officer”
• imposing a similar restriction on contact with children, “unless approved by [the defendant’s] probation officer”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).