Ninth Circuit· 1/20/2021

Travis Bean v. Dolly Matteucci

Citations

986 F.3d 1128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the extraordinary-circumstances exception applied because a plaintiff could not later vindicate his right to be free from forcible medication
noting that antipsychotic drugs 13 “tinker with the mental processes” and thus can “interfere[] with 14 a person’s self-autonomy,” and can even have “serious, even 15 fatal, side effects”
finding that Younger factors were satisfied in challenge to pending state court murder proceeding
noting that “the state mischaracterizes the 10 cognizability question as a subject-matter jurisdiction issue” and distinguishing “a petitioner’s 11 obligation to satisfy the elements of his claim for habeas relief” from “a district court’s subject- 12 matter jurisdiction”
noting that “the state mischaracterizes the 8 cognizability question as a subject-matter jurisdiction issue” and distinguishing “a petitioner’s 9 obligation to satisfy the elements of his claim for habeas relief” from “a district court’s subject- 10 matter jurisdiction”
agreeing with the district court’s conclusion that invalidating an involuntary medication order “would have the practical effect of enjoining the state criminal proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.