Skip to main content
· 8/31/2009

People v. Luis F.

Citations

  • 177 Cal. App. 4th 176
  • 99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 174
  • 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1441

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We agree with Luis that if the medication requirement were intended to subject him to future incarceration for failing to treat his toenail fungus as prescribed by a doctor, it would be impermissibly overbroad — not to mention unreasonable and arbitrary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.