United States v. Juan Jose Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no notice requirement that a court is considering imposing one of the discretionary conditions on supervised release listed in the Guidelines
• holding that there is no notice requirement that a court is considering imposing one of the discretionary conditions on supervised release listed in the Guidelines
• holding that the record and the court’s observations supported the imposition of mental health counseling
• holding that a “condition requiring participation in a mental health program is a routine . . . condition of supervised release.”
• holding that “all defendants are alerted” to the discretionary conditions listed in the Guidelines and therefore need not be given advance notice before such a condition is imposed at sentencing
• holding the record amply supported the need for mental health counseling where, inter alia , the district court observed the defendant in his appearances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).