Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 12/17/1999

United States v. Dakota

Citations

  • 197 F.3d 821
  • 84 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7427
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32820
  • 1999 WL 1210865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no nexus is required in part because Salinas left the nature of any necessary connection unanswered
  • “[A] client may waive the privilege by conduct which implies a waiver of the privilege or a consent to disclosure.” (citation omitted)
  • “The burden of establishing the existence of the privilege rests with the person asserting it.”
  • “Absent an indication that the lawyer should act in a capacity other than that of the company’s lawyer, a corporate officer will not have a privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gilman, Graham, Siler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Dakota

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.