United States v. Steven L. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “business records are nontestimonial and therefore do not implicate the Confrontation Clause concerns of Crawford”
• holding that “business records are nontestimonial and therefore do not implicate the Confrontation Clause concerns of Crawford”
• “[T]hese two standards of review are not in fact inconsistent because it is an abuse of discretion to make errors of law or clear errors of factual determinations.”
• “The ‘plain error’ rule also applies to a case . . . in which a party objects to the submission of evidence on specific grounds in the trial court, but on appeal the party asserts new grounds challenging the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).