King's Daughters Health Sys.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that any waiver of the attorney-client or work product privileges only extends to the “same subject matter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re FirstEnergy Corp.
  Sixth Circuit· 2025-10-03
• Trustees of Columbia University v. Gen Digital Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2026-03-11

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• Cheney v. United States District Court for District of Columbia
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 1,878×
• Church of Scientology of California v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1992-11-16· cited 1,710×
• Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court· 2009-12-08· cited 931×
• Alexander v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1906-03-12· cited 300×
• In Re: Gregory Lott
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-09-09· cited 121×
• In Re Columbia/Hca Healthcare Corporation Billing Practices Litigation
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-06-10· cited 114×
• United States v. Dakota
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-12-17· cited 99×
• In Re Professionals Direct Insurance
  Sixth Circuit· 2009-08-24· cited 89×
• In Re Perrigo Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1997-10-23· cited 85×
• In Re Powerhouse Licensing, LLC
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-03-02· cited 81×
• United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc., Hca, Inc. And West Paces Medical Center
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-04-11· cited 48×
• In Re Air Crash At Belle Harbor, New York On November 12, 2001.
  Second Circuit· 2007-05-08· cited 42×
• United States v. Richard Paulus
  Sixth Circuit· 2018-06-25· cited 33×
• Holt-Orsted v. City of Dickson
  Sixth Circuit· 2011-05-24· cited 30×
• United States v. Marlon Louis Johnson, Timothy Duane Neal, Witness-Appellant
  Sixth Circuit· 1984-06-11· cited 21×
• United States v. Richard E. Paulus
  Sixth Circuit· 2020-03-05· cited 5×