United States v. David A. Sturman (90-3147) Ralph L. Levine (90-3148) Reuben Sturman (90-3151) and Melvin Kaminsky (90-3750)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[i]t is reasonable to assume that a person who has foreign bank accounts would read the information specified by the government in tax forms”
• finding a severance argument waived when it was not renewed during trial
• certification does not need to be. physically attached to records or identify specific records being authenticated
• “[W]hen the questioning of the jurors occurs during the trial it is preferable it be done by the judge. Jurors may resent being questioned directly by counsel.”
• “substantial compliance with Rule 15 rebuts any claims based on due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).