United States v. Yolanda Wilson (97-1810) and Marlon Wilson (97-1695)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that while certain burglaries of a commercial building may qualify as crimes of violence, “the burglary of a non-dwelling is not a crime of violence per se under [the guidelines]”
• holding that while certain burglaries of a commercial building may qualify as crimes of violence, “the burglary of a non-dwelling is not a crime of violence per se under [the guidelines]”
• noting that, in determining whether a statement falls within the co-conspirator hearsay exception, a court can consider the statement in determining whether a conspiracy existed
• “The mere fact that a conspiracy can be subdivided . . . does not mean that multiple conspiracies existed.”
• statements admissible where preponderance of the evidence shows a conspiracy existed, defendant was a party thereto, and co-conspirators’ statements were made in furtherance thereof
• “[A] proceeding is core under § 157 if it invokes a substantive right provided by title 11 or if it is a proceeding that, by its nature, could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).